My poem “Crow’s Rosary”
December 28, 2010
Keeping with the bird theme, a Tweet by Juliet Wilson reminded me of an old poem of mine written in 1987, when I was part of the Hoboken, NJ, poetry scene. It was published in the journal Chalk Circle in 1989, when I was one of a group of writers known as “The Decompositionalists.”
“Crow’s Rosary” was about the changes that were happening in Hoboken at the time, and the clash of cultures that continued thereafter as the mix of ethnicity and artists gave way to gentrification. No doubt it is a very different place today.
Here is my poem
Crow’s Rosary
Hoboken again after so long gone, yet the gregarious scent of coffee lingers;
the ka-chung, ka-choong of the old furnaces is replaced by the dolorous
buttoning of starched white collars–
Tinderbox matchbooks, this town harbors a legacy of fire–
a last-resort for some to stem the tide of condo-conversion.
The siren-scourge filling the air once filled by shipyard steam.
One crow equals one square mile in this mile-square-city and that lone crow
follows me from rooftop to steeple, from apartment to train depot,
end to end and back again–“Carrion waiting, carrion waiting!” he cawcries.
Somewhere on the cobblestone Court Street, he stops–
the garbage piled high in the alleyway.
Resuming flight, his feathers soiled by ashes, carrion of this
melting pot boiling over too high a flame–his rosary chanted-out above
the rooftops; church bells echo the litany of the displaced, “Carry on waiting.”
“I’ll die in your rosary,” sighs the Hoboken muse. “So carry on waiting.”
The Hoboken muse, the wife, dressed in black even in the heat of summer,
soothes the dusky sky.
The hammer’s hammer harkens: “Make way! Make way for the new tide that
rises above the din and dun! A new sleep is upon us!”
No morning comes without the hammer’s calling for work to be done;
another home displaced in Hoboken. They never cease except for
the obligatory coffee break taken 10 minutes after waking us all up.
A peregrine falcon rests on our laundry pole out back,
starling-eyed–showing us the underside of our breadwinning days,
challenging us to use those drear, found things.
The litany of lonesomeness leaves nothing left for the crow’s rosary
to be counted on. In the weepdusk, he cries in a deafening crowd,
“Carry on waiting, carrion. Carrion waiting!”
The curry-garlic-jalapeño-covered walls and streets now come
prepackaged, processed for microwaves and barbecues–
I see, in my eros-dreaminess, your suppliant flesh
resting on the tar beach; feel the embrace that comes
when our flesh conjugates a verb–
while the crow, soaring alone, surveys the tumult of our disheveled days.
This is a ghost of Hoboken–and I am to carry on with my waiting,
carry on as the crow with his lonesome rosary.
Who has the time to let the coffee steep, to savor the “last drop?”
And what does this new Hoboken mean to us, so unlike what it was to us?
Altar-clouds rise above us, an endless stream of
forgetting and rising, forgetting and rising,
linked by the crow’s rosary, the litany of lonesomeness.
There’s a gibbous moon out back, illuminating the night kitchen.
“Thee sees we love our garden,” says the Hoboken muse. “Let me assure you:
tho’ it may be only clapboards and clay pots now, its future is ardorous bounty…”
We live in shells cast aside by others, hollow bodies awaiting obsolescence.
Knowing this, the streets seem more calamitous.
Knowing this, we set-about preparing the earth’s redeeming.
Now you come to me with your chalice of hopelessness:
We are never so alone as when we long for lost things.
—Scott Edward Anderson, Chalk Circle 1989
My poem “Confusing Fall Warblers” as an Xtranormal Movie
December 22, 2010
For all my birding friends out there, who are preparing for the Christmas Bird Count, I thought I would share my poem, “Confusing Fall Warblers.”
The poem was inspired by Plate 52 in Roger Tory Peterson’s A Field Guide to the Birds, which bears the same title, and features all the bird names that appear in that plate in one poem.
I’ve also decided to try out Xtranormal — a fun text-to-movie application, which adds a curious dimension to the telling of the poem, which you can watch here:
Here is the poem as it appeared in the journal Isotope, Spring 2004:
Confusing Fall Warblers
(Roger Tory Peterson’s A Field Guide to the Birds, plate 52)
“You changed your name from Brown to Jones and mine from Brown to Blue” George Jones
Was it Hank Williams
she called the Nashville warbler,
or was it the black-throated blue?
Was it Wilson’s warbler
she heard in the bog up north
chattering chi chi chi chi chi chet chet?
Yellow-throat or orange-crowned,
from Tennessee, Connecticut, or
Canada, the prothonotary
clerks for the vireo from Philly,
who is neither lawyer nor warbler,
but is often mistaken–
Was it the hooded warbler
that startled her from the thicket,
or mourning warbler’s balancing notes
chirry chirry, chorry chorry,
that made her cock her head
to listen for its secret?
And tell me, tell me truly,
was it only
that sad country song
playing on the car radio
that made her cry?
–Scott Edward Anderson
Collap$e, or The Financial Suicides
December 11, 2010
The apparent suicide of Mark Madoff, son of Bernie Madoff, on the 2nd anniversary of his father’s arrest put me in mind of a poem I wrote about the financial crisis and the rising number of suicides among high-fliers.
At the time, there were reports that a growing number of individuals who “had it all” and lived extravagantly but couldn’t handle it when their house of cards fell.
The second line is a reference to W.B. Yeats’ poem, “The Scholars,” and there is an intentional pun in the first stanza, which was first noticed by my pal, Joe Donohue, who read an early version of the poem, and which wasn’t as poignant at the time.
Here is my poem,
Collap$e, or The Financial Suicides
Damned and damning are the fools,
Their bald heads forgetful of sins.
Believing greed and graft are virtues,
They made all the rules,
Spent lavishly on short-term views,
And made-off with the most wins.
Masters of the Universe,
They excel at immoderation, going all-out,
But never mastered failure or humility.
Faced with losing everything or worse –
Riches and status – they take the tidy,
Albeit cowardly way out.
In the end, they come to find out
Everything that man builds or begins
Endures only for a moment.
Their legacies, without a doubt,
Are consumed in the fires they foment
With their lies, deceit, and sins.
–Scott Edward Anderson
John Lennon at 70
December 8, 2010
- Image via Wikipedia
The Beatles Story, a Liverpool Museum devoted to the Fab Four and that British city’s favorite sons, held a poetry contest this fall in honor of John Lennon.
John would have been 70 years old on October 9, 2010, had he not been gunned down by a psychopath 30 years ago today.
The contest rules were simple: 40 lines on Lennon for his 40 years on Earth. I entered, but didn’t win the contest.
And although it may ruin my poem’s chances of being published in The New Yorker (to whom I’ve recently submitted it — forgive me, Paul Muldoon), I’ve decided that it’s important for me to share it with you on this day when so many of us are remembering John.
Here is my poem:
John Lennon at 70
“The streets are full of admirable craftsmen,
but so few practical dreamers.”–Man Ray
Lennon, the boy, practically an orphan;
Chip on his shoulder, mad at the world.
Lennon, the teenager, the rocker, the mocker,
Hard-driven, jealous, troublemaker, and bold.
Lennon, the young man, an edge to his attitude
And confident swagger; “To the top Johnny!”
Lennon, maturing, tightening up, melodic,
But still biting, sardonic, coming into his own.
Lennon, twenty-five, songsmith; honest, open, real.
A turning point: meeting drugs and Dylan.
Lennon, experimenting, laying down tricks
Rather than tracks; quirky, artistic, obscure.
Lennon, twenty-eight, life changed by a “Yes.”
Branching out, becoming an Artist.
Lennon, approaching thirty, back to his roots;
Raw, stripped-bare, primal screaming J.
Lennon, early 30s, getting political in the N-Y-C,
Under the influence; message trumping music.
Dr. Winston O’Boogie, mid-30s, recapturing
Some of the old magic, putting aside mind games.
Mr. Lennon, “retired,” house-husband, baking
Bread and raising a son; “just watching the wheels…”
Lennon, stretching out, almost forty,
Enjoying writing again, for himself and for Sean.
Lennon at 40, middle-age for most, a new record out.
He’s done more than many at this age or older, even.
Lennon, talking to his audience of survivors,
“We made it through the seventies, didn’t we?”
Lennon, walking in Central Park with Yoko.
“It’s John Lennon I can’t believe it…”
Lennon letting his guard down,
A new sense of purpose, renewal, direction—
Lennon, at 40, dead in his doorway.
“I read the news today, oh boy…”
Lennon’s life: meteoric, troubled, brilliant,
Full fathom flaming—
Lennon at 70: would he be a grumpy old man,
Still on the stage — or both? We’ll never know.
I read the news today and think: We need him;
Then hear John’s voice, singing “Love is all you need.”
–Scott Edward Anderson
On Inspiring a Love of Poetry in Children
November 30, 2010
The wonderful poetry library in Lower Manhattan, Poets House, asked:
Easy. My favorite poems as a child were “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge and “The Jabberwocky” by Lewis Carroll.
Of course, I also enjoyed Robert Louis Stevenson’s collection, A Child’s Garden of Verses, but these two poems left the biggest impression.
In fact, the former served as a model for the first long poem I ever wrote, which thankfully doesn’t survive. It was a rambling “epic” about my great grandfather, Nathan Lewis Burgess, a whaler who sailed out of New Bedford in the late 19th Century.
The latter was just chosen by my oldest son, Jasper, for an audition at the school play this year. Hearing him recite “Twas brillig, and the slithy toves. Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:/ All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe,” the other night was music to my ears.
I have always tried to cultivate a love of poetry in my children. First, with the aforementioned eldest, who once accompanied me to a reading I hosted for Ducky Magazine, which I founded with two friends. I think Jasper must have been nine. When one of the poets on the bill was delayed by traffic, I had my son read her poems to the audience.
And we often read poems from Stevenson’s Garden, as well as The Random House Book of Poetry for Children, Mother Goose, and individual poems on special occasions around the dinner table.
My children all know their father is a poet, and I always encourage them to write their own poems. (I still have Jasper’s collection of poems, which he prepared in a little booklet for sixth grade.)
And last May, I took my younger son, Walker, to Poets House to meet and hear one of my poetry teachers, Robert Hass. As I wrote about earlier on this blog, Walker brought a poem to share, which Bob read aloud during the morning children’s program.
And recently, my daughter Elizabeth told her teacher that her father was a poet and volunteered me to come in to share some poetry with her class.
The keys to sharing poetry with children? Keep it simple, make sure it rhymes, don’t try to analyze the poems (unless they do), and show them how much you love poetry. They will get it.
A love of poetry is a wonderful legacy to pass on.
When the Spirit Moves You, Go With It
November 18, 2010
Back in November 2002 I was a poet-in-residence at the Millay Colony in upstate New York. I went up there with the kernels of a big, ambitious new project in mind — my poetic sequence called “Dwelling.”
One day, November 17th to be exact, I took a break from writing and went for a hike in the woods. In the middle of the woods I had a kind of vision of my childhood.
I was in the woods with Gladys Taylor, who we called Aunt Gladys and who looked after me those days. Really, I was her protegé. (I have two slim books of stories she wrote about my exploits as a toddler.)
Suddenly, as rarely happens, I had one of those bolts of inspiration and was compelled to run back to my studio. I sat down at the desk, grabbed my notebook, and wrote furiously. Some 250 lines later, I put down my pencil and went to the communal dining hall. When I got back after dinner and read what I had written, I thought some of it was pretty good.
The best of it was the story of Gladys’s “education” of me — I always say that everything I learned, I learned from Gladys Taylor.
Wanting to acknowledge Gladys in a dedication, I looked up her birth date on the Social Security Death Index (she died in 1986). It turned out, I was writing the poem on what would have been her 100th birthday! (This past Wednesday would have been her 108th.)
As a dear friend of mine said to me once, “Coincidence is God’s way of remaining mysterious.”
Here is my poem, which was a runner-up for the Robert Frost Foundation Poetry Award a few years ago:
The Postlude
“What dwelling shall receive me?…The earth is all before me.”
–Wordsworth, “The Prelude”
I am a child, crawling around in the leaves
With Gladys Taylor while she names the trees,
parts the grasses, digs into the earth with a gardener’s trowel.
She picks out worms and slugs, millipedes
And springtails, which we see with a “Berlese funnel.”
Busy decomposers working their busy tasks,
Turning waste into energy, leaf litter into soil again.
Gladys names things for me: “That oak,
That maple there, that sassafras, smell its roots.”
“Root beer!” I exclaim,
Her laughter peeling away into the hills. Later,
With Comstock’s Handbook of Nature Study
On the table next to the unending jigsaw puzzle,
Gladys opens to “The Oaks,” reading or reciting:
“The symbol of strength since man first gazed
Upon its noble proportions…” Then she sings Virgil,
Full in the midst of his own strength he stands
Stretching his brawny arms and leafy hands,
His shade protects the plains, his head the hills commands.
Leaves and acorns spread across the table,
Each divided to its source, as if cataloguing specimens:
The white and chestnut oaks, red and scarlet,
Every oak in the neighborhood, sketching the leaves,
Tracing and coloring them. Then questions, such questions:
“Where did we see this one growing?” “How tall?”
“Are the branches crooked or straight?”
“Round leaves or pointy?”
And then a game of matching
Acorn to leaf; a most difficult lesson — as difficult
As those jigsaw puzzles for a boy lacking patience
Or attention. Outdoors again, to learn attention,
Naming the birds that came to eat at the feeder:
Chickadee, sparrow, nuthatch, tufted titmouse,
The ubiquitous jay.
“The mockingbird, hear
How he makes fun of all the other birds.” Now
Thrasher, now robin, the sweet sweet sweet,
Very merry cheer of the song sparrow,
Or the flicker’s whicka whicka wick-a-wick.
Then a jay’s piercing caw, a cat’s meow,
This was all the mocker’s doing! And wide-eyed,
I stare, as Gladys seems to call birds to her side.
“The robin tells us when it’s going to rain,
Not just when spring is come,” she says. “Look
How he sings as he waits for worms to surface.”
That summer, rowing around the pond
By Brookfield’s floating bridge, I saw a beaver
Slap the water with its tail, and then swim around the boat,
As if in warning. Under water a moment later he went,
Only to appear twenty yards away, scrambling up the bank,
Back to his busy work. “Busy as a beaver,” Gladys laughs.
Then a serious tone, “You know that beavers gathered
The mud with which the earth was made?”
(I later learned this was Indian legend; to her
There was little difference among the ways of knowing.)
All around the pond the beavers made of the creek,
The sharp points of their handiwork: birches broken
For succulent shoots, twigs, leaves and bark bared.
“When they hear running water, they’ve just got
To get back to work!” Beavers moving across
The water, noses up, branches in their teeth,
Building or repairing dams or adding to their lodges,
Lodges that look like huts Indians might have used.
I watched for them — beavers and Indians — when
Out on the water, and once I remember a beaver
Jumping clear out of the water over the bow of the rowboat!
Later, wading in the mud shallows by the pond’s pebbly edge,
I came out of the water to find leeches covering my feet,
Filling the spaces between my toes. Screaming, fascinated,
I learned that they sucked blood, little bloodsuckers,
A kind of worm, which were once used to reduce fever.
That was me to Gladys Taylor’s teaching,
Wanting to soak up everything she had to give me.
We picked pea pods out of the garden, shelled
On the spot, our thumbs a sort prying-spoon,
And ate blackberries by the bushel or bellyful,
Probably blueberries, too, I don’t know. And
Seeing the milkweed grown fat with its milk,
I popped it open, squirting the white viscous
Juice at my brother. Gladys always found
A caterpillar on the milkweed leaves, tiger stripes
Of black, white, and yellow. “Monarchs,” she said,
“The most beautiful butterfly you’ll ever see.”
I looked incredulously at the caterpillar, believing,
Because she was Gladys, but not believing her,
That this wiggly, worm-like thing could be a butterfly.
Later, she found a chrysalis and took the leaf
And twig from which it hung. She placed it atop
A jar on the picnic table, and each day we waited
— waited for what? I didn’t know. Until one day,
It was empty, a hollow, blue-green emerald shell,
And I almost cried. “Look, out in the meadow,”
She instructed. Hundreds, it seemed like
Thousands, of monarch butterflies flitting about,
From flower to flower!
The wooly-bear
Was easier to study. We put it in a jar with a twig
And fresh grass every day; it curled and slept and ate
Until one day it climbed, climbed to the top
Of the twig and spun a cocoon from its own hairs.
There it stayed for weeks, until at last I thought it dead.
But then, emerging from its silky capsule, a hideous sight:
Gray, tawny, dull–a tiger moth! Nothing like the cute
And fuzzy reddish-brown and black teddy bear we’d found.
“This is magic,” said Gladys. “Nature’s magic.”
And I believed her, believe her still, that there is some magic
In nature speaking within us when we are in it, of it, let it in–
Science may explain this all away, physics or biology,
But nothing will shake my faith in this:
That the force of nature, the inner fire, anima mundi,
Gaia, or whatever you may call it, is alive within each
Being and everything with which we share this earth.
My Mother Earth was Gladys Taylor, and she
Taught me these things, and about poetry and art,
In the few, brief years we had together. Gladys
Taught me how to look at the world — to pay attention.
Thus began my education from Nature’s bosom:
A woman, childless herself (I believe) who,
In her dungarees and work-shirt, took a child
Under her wing and gave him gold,
Gave him his desire for dwelling on this earth.
(For Gladys Taylor, 17 November 1902-18 March 1986)
–Scott Edward Anderson
William Stafford, Rimbaud & the Poet as an Embarrassed Young Man
November 15, 2010
Poet William Stafford was a quiet and gentle force in poetry. He liked it that way; at least that’s what he told The Paris Review in 1989. (I think it was published in 1993, the year he died.)
As William Young, the interviewer, wrote in his introduction,
The intimacy of William Stafford’s poetry would seem to belie the enormous popularity the poet’s work has enjoyed, but in fact it is a product of Stafford’s keen ability to discern poetic language in everyday speech and appropriate it for his own work.
Stafford, whose first volume of poetry was not published until 1960 when he was forty-six, was born in the small town of Hutchinson, Kansas, on January 17, 1914 and died in Portland, Oregon, on August 28, 1993 at the age of seventy-nine.
He came to my high school when I was a freshman and read poetry to us. I had been reading the French poet Arthur Rimbaud, in the Louise Varese translation published by New Directions, and was all hopped up about the poet as visionary and seer, about the power of poetic vision on the soul.
So, when it came to the Q&A, I raised my hand and asked, “Mr. Stafford, do you agree with Rimbaud that the the poet must be a visionary?”
It was a brilliant question. I stood there while the entire audience turned around to admire my brilliance.
Then I saw their faces. One classmate in particular, one of the drama students, looked at me incredulously and mouthed something that appeared to be “Rim-bod?!”
Then I realized what I had done. Despite being in my fourth year of French lessons, I had badly butchered Rimbaud’s name, and rather than sounding like “Rambo,” I had made it sound like “Rim-bod.”
My face went red. I sank down into my seat. Humiliated.
Stafford, for his part, very calmly looked at me and answered, “No. I think the poet needs to be able to see the world he or she lives in, but not necessarily be visionary. Paying attention goes a lot longer than vision.”
You can read many of William Stafford’s poems at Selected William Stafford Poetry.
“Cultivating (Preserving)” in Bolts of Silk
October 19, 2010
While I was away this weekend up at the Rodale Institute’s organic farm in Kutztown, Pennsylvania, my poem “Cultivating (Preserving)” appeared in the Scottish online journal, Bolts of Silk. It’s another poem from my “Dwelling” sequence, which Alison Hawthorne Deming has called, “a phenomenology of how we live on the Earth.”
Bolts of Silk, which has the subtitle “beautiful poetry with something to say,” is curated by the delightful Crafty Green Poet, Juliet Wilson of Edinburgh, Scotland, whom I met through our both being published in another Scottish journal, Anon.
The irony of this poem being published while I was unplugged up at an organic farm was not lost on me. Perhaps (I’m not going to ask) it wasn’t lost on Juliet, who follows me on Twitter and could very well have seen my last tweet on Friday evening as I was heading to the farm.
In any event, here is my poem,
Cultivating (Preserving)
Dwelling as preserving
is cultivating.
Dwelling means knowing
what inhabits a place
and understanding that
which belongs to a place.
We cultivate what grows,
while building things
that don’t grow.
We seek the organic
in our own creations,
which are inorganic.
Imposing our will
on the landscape,
we can remove either
that which promotes capacity
or that which prevents capacity.
We are tenders of the garden,
we tend what needs tending
(heart or “langscape”)
What we save remains—
–Scott Edward Anderson
On John Lennon’s “Help!”
October 9, 2010

- Cover of John Lennon
The debate about rock lyrics and poetry has been going on for decades. Ever since Bob Dylan hit the scene in the early ’60s and songs started to be about more than dance moves, teenage love, and holding hands.
The Beatles started to break out of that mold in late 1964 through 1966 with their principle songwriters — perhaps the greatest songwriting team ever — John Lennon and Paul McCartney branching out into new sounds and new concerns.
Lennon, who would have been 70 today, started writing more personal, introspective songs, clearly showing the influence of Bob Dylan. And McCartney wrote two of his most poetic songs in this period, “Eleanor Rigby” and “Yesterday.”
While Lennon songs like “You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away,” “Nowhere Man,” “In My Life,” and “Norwegian Wood,” are often cited as revealing the more personal John, it is with “Help!” that I think John really puts himself on the line.
Recorded in April 1965, it was, according to some accounts, a throw-away; something John had to dash off after the film they were working on had been renamed.
But John himself revealed in 1980’s Playboy interview with David Sheff that “I was actually crying out for help. Most people think it’s just a fast rock ‘n roll song. I didn’t realize it at the time…but later, I knew I really was crying out for help.”
When I was younger, so much younger than today,
I never needed anybody’s help in any way.
But now these days are gone, I’m not so self assured,
Now I find I’ve changed my mind and opened up the doors.Help me if you can, I’m feeling down
And I do appreciate you being round.
Help me, get my feet back on the ground,
Won’t you please, please help me?
Despite its jaunty pop melody and speed, the song is really a plaintive poem that has a maturity beyond the author’s then 24 years.
“It was my fat Elvis period,” Lennon told Sheff. He was “very fat, very insecure, and he’s completely lost himself. And I am singing about when I was so much younger and all the rest, looking back at how easy it was. Now I may be very positive… yes, yes… but I also go through deep depressions where I would like to jump out the window, you know. It becomes easier to deal with as I get older; I don’t know whether you learn control or, when you grow up, you calm down a little. Anyway, I was fat and depressed and I was crying out for help.”
He was seemingly on top of the world, had everything he imagined he wanted from the group’s early days. And yet, seeing himself from outside himself, John the vulnerable man sees Beatle John and recognizes things are not all they seem.
And now my life has changed in oh so many ways,
My independence seems to vanish in the haze.
But every now and then I feel so insecure,
I know that I just need you like I’ve never done before.
Lennon told Jann Wenner in Rolling Stone in the 1970 Rolling Stone interviews, that it was among his favorites “Because I meant it — it’s real. The lyric is as good now as it was then. It is no different, and it makes me feel secure to know that I was that aware of myself then. It was just me singing “Help” and I meant it. I don’t like the recording that much; we did it too fast trying to be commercial.”
The music is a mask of sorts, then, and perhaps John wasn’t quite that comfortable showing how insecure he was at the top of the pop world. But isn’t that what makes songs like “Tears of a Clown,” and Lennon’s own “I’m a Loser” so great?
Songs like “Help” reveal a vulnerability we all feel, but help us get past it through the sheer joy of the music and recognition that we’re not alone.
And really, I think that’s the mark of true genius, whether as a poet, musician, or pop star.
On Epigraphs & Cairns
September 18, 2010
David Orr had an interesting article in the New York Times this week about the use of epigraphs in contemporary poetry. He cites a number of recent examples and offers some historical context, pinning much of the blame for the prevalence of the practice on the shoulders of T.S. Eliot.
Orr also quotes literary theorist Gérard Genette on the functions for epigraphs in his book “Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation.”
The first two are straightforward — an epigraph can comment on the title of a given work, or it can apply to the work’s body. But after that, matters get a little more “oblique,” as Genette diplomatically puts it. “Very often,” he says of the epigraph, “the main thing is not what it says but who its author is, plus the sense of indirect backing that its presence at the edge of a text gives rise to.”
This caused me to reflect upon my own use of epigraphs in my poetry. Turns out I use them a lot.
In my current manuscript iteration, perhaps a third of the poems have epigraphs. My “Dwelling” sequence, which had its origins in an essay by philosopher Martin Heidegger, even has a full page of quotations from source material for the poem.
In conversation with Julie Johnstone, a librarian at the Scottish Poetry Library, via Twitter this morning, I offered that I’ve used epigraphs as a leaping off point, to set the stage or as commentary on the poem.
In fact, a few recent poems, such as “Risks Are Risky,” and “Healing,” got their start from a line or quotation, the former from a tweet by Paulo Coelho; the latter a line from Gary Snyder.
“Perhaps they show where you’ve travelled while writing the poem,” Julie suggested, “and also where you and the poem are travelling to.”
I like the idea of epigraphs as signposts or, to borrow from the Scots, a cairn on the trail of the poem.



